AddThis Feed Button





High School Textbook Labels Upper Peninsula Map Incorrectly

Posted November 14, 2008 | Share this | Leave a comment

High School Textbook Labels Upper Peninsula Map Incorrectly

Back in February we reported on one of the ugliest maps we’ve ever seen of the Upper Peninsula (or Michigan for that matter). We asked all of you if you knew of any maps that were similar. Many times I’ve heard reports of maps that didn’t include the Upper Peninsula, mislabeled it, and various other scenarios.

On November 8th, the Daily Press of Escanaba reported another such story titled, “U.P. loses its identity”.

The earlier map we mentioned actually did have some justification. The outline they used is the actual state outline of Michigan which extends into the middle of Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, and Lake Huron. Now I would like to see the justification for this example.

As reported by the Daily Press the map (pictured above) was noticed by social studies high school students at Escanaba Area High School.

As you can see in the map every state is colored in and labeled with the two-letter abbreviation. However, for starters, the Upper Peninsula isn’t colored in like the rest of Michigan. And why is it labeled “IL” for Illinois!?!?

The students took it upon themselves to take action.

“We were studying suffrage before the Depression and it had a map of all the states and the U.P. was not included. We thought it was a little bit degrading, like we weren’t part of the U.S. It’s kind of ridiculous.”

Jack Klim

According to the article the students have written a letter to the publication company informing them of the error and went further to include some information about the Upper Peninsula (which is 1/3 of all the land in Michigan by the way). The book is titled, “United States History: Modern America (Michigan edition)”

Does anyone else have more examples of unfortunate Upper Peninsula maps?

A shoutout to Katie M. for sharing this article with us. Thanks Katie!



Save/Share: Add to Facebook Twit This Add to del.icio.us Add to Stumbleupon Add to Digg Add to Technorati Add to Newsvine Add to Blog Marks Add to Reddit

7 Comments

  1. Jen Ismirle | November 14th, 2008 2:47 am | Permalink

    wow, that’s incredible in such a bad way.
    especially for a book that is supposedly a “michigan edition.”

  2. Joel Stark | November 14th, 2008 10:09 am | Permalink

    Illinois isn’t even labeled. Maybe they thought that was the U.P.- a Legitimate mixup.

  3. Marisa | November 14th, 2008 11:33 am | Permalink

    So how come the upper peninsula doesn’t belong to wisconsin? :)

  4. Terry Reilly | November 14th, 2008 11:41 am | Permalink

    Back in the 2000 elections with Bush and Gore, I was watching the news (Fox?), and the lower peninsula was colored blue, while the UP was colored gray like Canada. It was a bit of a slap in the face.

  5. Jen Healy | November 14th, 2008 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Wait, so, they thought Illinois was just an unclaimed mass of land….?
    Last time I checked I couldn’t see Canada from the Sears Tower, but, what do I know.

  6. Jen Healy | November 14th, 2008 7:18 pm | Permalink

    P.S. This frightens me. A lot.

  7. Paul Pouttu | November 14th, 2008 8:00 pm | Permalink

    I wonder what other types of mistakes a textbook like that would make. It only opens up the idea that any textbook could make a mistake on anything.

Leave Your Comments...




Current Poll

  • What are your 3 favorite Upper Peninsula ski hills?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Explore Yooper Steez

Search